Berliner Boersenzeitung - Families of Boeing MAX crash victims set to face company in US court

EUR -
AED 3.888366
AFN 72.007736
ALL 98.044838
AMD 410.170574
ANG 1.901073
AOA 967.064771
ARS 1060.501272
AUD 1.623064
AWG 1.899709
AZN 1.799366
BAM 1.953279
BBD 2.129871
BDT 126.057292
BGN 1.952224
BHD 0.398909
BIF 3115.508099
BMD 1.058644
BND 1.413089
BOB 7.315557
BRL 6.111442
BSD 1.054853
BTN 89.081019
BWP 14.351679
BYN 3.452077
BYR 20749.413776
BZD 2.126276
CAD 1.477893
CDF 3038.306822
CHF 0.935492
CLF 0.037265
CLP 1028.250492
CNY 7.665958
CNH 7.668062
COP 4649.975387
CRC 536.21295
CUC 1.058644
CUP 28.054054
CVE 110.122859
CZK 25.290778
DJF 187.839321
DKK 7.46006
DOP 63.528601
DZD 141.060489
EGP 52.416091
ERN 15.879653
ETB 129.830375
FJD 2.398994
FKP 0.835605
GBP 0.834698
GEL 2.906005
GGP 0.835605
GHS 16.803311
GIP 0.835605
GMD 74.638017
GNF 9091.351252
GTQ 8.143489
GYD 220.58528
HKD 8.239132
HNL 26.653101
HRK 7.551579
HTG 138.572447
HUF 408.38209
IDR 16798.661875
ILS 3.961799
IMP 0.835605
INR 89.326542
IQD 1381.816426
IRR 44574.187371
ISK 145.478712
JEP 0.835605
JMD 167.30721
JOD 0.750892
JPY 164.392513
KES 136.756692
KGS 91.570837
KHR 4284.510257
KMF 492.03104
KPW 952.778803
KRW 1472.562789
KWD 0.325491
KYD 0.879065
KZT 523.434379
LAK 23128.365625
LBP 94461.666267
LKR 306.90676
LRD 191.984916
LSL 19.069364
LTL 3.1259
LVL 0.640363
LYD 5.145407
MAD 10.539296
MDL 19.171436
MGA 4930.705575
MKD 61.505577
MMK 3438.432988
MNT 3597.27076
MOP 8.456685
MRU 41.982208
MUR 49.00302
MVR 16.355939
MWK 1829.16493
MXN 21.311908
MYR 4.732364
MZN 67.710251
NAD 19.071883
NGN 1773.0268
NIO 38.82026
NOK 11.63931
NPR 142.531375
NZD 1.793263
OMR 0.407598
PAB 1.054838
PEN 4.003133
PGK 4.244561
PHP 62.354952
PKR 293.143779
PLN 4.334194
PYG 8215.473514
QAR 3.847034
RON 4.976048
RSD 116.96761
RUB 105.599193
RWF 1450.954598
SAR 3.974354
SBD 8.860338
SCR 14.906727
SDG 636.775466
SEK 11.569524
SGD 1.417783
SHP 0.835605
SLE 23.923391
SLL 22199.231145
SOS 602.833284
SRD 37.622602
STD 21911.784299
SVC 9.230086
SYP 2659.873554
SZL 19.06666
THB 36.597095
TJS 11.212927
TMT 3.715839
TND 3.32371
TOP 2.479452
TRY 36.568349
TTD 7.162755
TWD 34.39586
TZS 2803.250008
UAH 43.549805
UGX 3883.986759
USD 1.058644
UYU 45.281553
UZS 13528.538093
VES 48.468632
VND 26905.426078
VUV 125.684291
WST 2.9553
XAF 655.120688
XAG 0.034088
XAU 0.000402
XCD 2.861037
XDR 0.802376
XOF 655.120688
XPF 119.331742
YER 264.549116
ZAR 19.145913
ZMK 9529.097509
ZMW 29.140662
ZWL 340.882794
  • RBGPF

    59.6500

    59.65

    +100%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0700

    6.62

    -1.06%

  • GSK

    -0.2300

    33.46

    -0.69%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    13.26

    +0.23%

  • RELX

    0.2500

    45.29

    +0.55%

  • CMSC

    -0.0590

    24.565

    -0.24%

  • BCC

    -3.3600

    138.18

    -2.43%

  • SCS

    -0.1100

    13.09

    -0.84%

  • CMSD

    -0.0460

    24.344

    -0.19%

  • NGG

    0.6800

    63.58

    +1.07%

  • RIO

    0.3100

    62.43

    +0.5%

  • VOD

    0.0000

    8.92

    0%

  • AZN

    0.4100

    63.8

    +0.64%

  • BCE

    0.0800

    27.31

    +0.29%

  • BTI

    0.2500

    36.93

    +0.68%

  • BP

    -0.3300

    29.09

    -1.13%

Families of Boeing MAX crash victims set to face company in US court
Families of Boeing MAX crash victims set to face company in US court / Photo: TONY KARUMBA - AFP/File

Families of Boeing MAX crash victims set to face company in US court

Relatives of passengers who died in the twin Boeing 737 MAX crashes are scheduled to confront the airplane maker Thursday in a US court, some four years after the tragedies in Ethiopia and Indonesia.

Text size:

The proceeding in Fort Worth, Texas, long sought by the families and resisted by the aerospace giant, is expected to include Boeing's entry of either a guilty or not guilty plea in a US criminal settlement over the calamities that claimed 346 lives.

The families have already chalked up some victories from US District Judge Reed O'Connor, who last week ordered a Boeing representative to appear at Thursday's arraignment after ruling in October that the Department of Justice's deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with Boeing was negotiated in violation of the families' rights.

But those were stepping stones to the families' ultimate ambition in the case: Undoing key elements of the DPA, which required Boeing to pay $2.5 billion in fines and restitution in exchange for immunity from criminal prosecution for charges Boeing defrauded the government during the certification of the MAX.

Boeing and its top executives deserve no such relief, argue attorneys for the families, who also plan to ask the court to establish an independent monitor because "the Justice Department cannot be trusted to monitor Boeing," they say in a brief.

"This is a case that involved 346 people dying," attorney Paul Cassell told AFP. "Why you wouldn't want an independent set of eyes looking in and making sure the criminal conduct isn't still going on is beyond me."

Boeing has avoided commenting on the case outside of legal briefs, but Chief Executive Dave Calhoun told CNBC on Wednesday that he felt "nothing but heartbreak" for the families and supported their right to a hearing.

"With respect to the legal proceeding itself, that's not a subject that I'm qualified to talk about," Calhoun said.

- Victim's rights -

The families have criticized the agreement ever since it was announced in January 2021, waging a battle not only against Boeing, but a second 800-pound gorilla: the Department of Justice.

In unveiling the agreement, DOJ said Boeing was being held accountable for "fraudulent and deceptive" conduct towards Federal Aviation Administration regulators during the MAX certification when the company omitted key facts about the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), a flight handling system that badly malfunctioned in both crashes.

The DOJ's case spotlighted the deceptions of two Boeing technical pilots, but absolved leadership, concluding Boeing's misconduct was neither "pervasive" nor "facilitated by senior management," according to the DPA.

But the families have rejected the validity of the agreement, arguing in legal briefs that Boeing's immunization from prosecution should be stripped because the DOJ flouted the US Crime Victims' Rights Act, which required the government to confer with them prior to entering into the agreement.

O'Connor, in an October 21 ruling, backed the families' essential argument, ruling that they qualified as "crime victims" and concluding that Boeing's deceptions cost the relatives their loved ones.

"In sum, but for Boeing's criminal conspiracy to defraud the FAA, 346 people would not have lost their lives in the crashes," O'Connor wrote.

- Prosecutorial discretion -

Adding to the families' momentum has been the Securities and Exchange Commission, which in September fined Boeing $200 million for misleading investors about the MAX.

The SEC case homed in on a November 2018 press release approved by then-CEO Dennis Muilenburg after the first deadly crash on Indonesia's Lion Air.

He stated that the MAX was "as safe as any plane that has ever flown the skies," even though the company was urgently addressing the MCAS problem.

The agency also penalized Muilenburg $1 million in a settlement with the ex-CEO that accused him of "materially misleading" statements.

O'Connor has not ruled on potential remedies.

Legal experts say courts typically show deference towards the DOJ on such agreements.

"The judge could cancel the DPA but I think that is unlikely," said Columbia University Professor John Coffee, who has criticized Justice's Boeing settlement as emblematic of the government's tendency to go easy on big, powerful companies.

"Prosecutors and the Executive Branch are given great discretion by law in that area (the decision to prosecute)," Coffee told AFP in an email.

Brandon Garrett, a professor at Duke University Law School, said courts should consider the public interest during reviews of DPAs, adding that US law "permits such review."

But Garrett said courts have generally interpreted their role "very narrowly," while the DOJ has usually opposed such a review.

"If this judge does reject the agreement, I could imagine the DOJ would appeal, citing their prosecutorial discretion to defer prosecution," Garrett said.

(O.Joost--BBZ)