Berliner Boersenzeitung - In EU, a food fight over nutrition labels

EUR -
AED 4.028134
AFN 75.541432
ALL 98.748074
AMD 426.662058
ANG 1.986858
AOA 1012.250153
ARS 1065.161605
AUD 1.612325
AWG 1.974052
AZN 1.867068
BAM 1.955168
BBD 2.22588
BDT 131.737409
BGN 1.955856
BHD 0.413395
BIF 3198.613784
BMD 1.096695
BND 1.431022
BOB 7.617537
BRL 5.98335
BSD 1.102444
BTN 92.505093
BWP 14.582285
BYN 3.607734
BYR 21495.230494
BZD 2.222082
CAD 1.48957
CDF 3148.612164
CHF 0.940921
CLF 0.036739
CLP 1013.730605
CNY 7.696939
CNH 7.775691
COP 4567.977753
CRC 571.851618
CUC 1.096695
CUP 29.062429
CVE 110.229362
CZK 25.348086
DJF 196.306533
DKK 7.454519
DOP 66.302796
DZD 145.735735
EGP 53.009759
ERN 16.450432
ETB 131.889377
FJD 2.394634
FKP 0.835198
GBP 0.836123
GEL 3.004436
GGP 0.835198
GHS 17.440361
GIP 0.835198
GMD 75.671832
GNF 9518.660323
GTQ 8.530242
GYD 230.635435
HKD 8.51776
HNL 27.412138
HRK 7.456444
HTG 145.361619
HUF 401.465653
IDR 17212.250983
ILS 4.156728
IMP 0.835198
INR 92.082715
IQD 1444.133105
IRR 46176.361194
ISK 148.941921
JEP 0.835198
JMD 174.193682
JOD 0.777233
JPY 162.798402
KES 142.219375
KGS 92.896174
KHR 4474.818489
KMF 492.361743
KPW 987.025268
KRW 1479.694687
KWD 0.335765
KYD 0.918703
KZT 532.40787
LAK 24343.129755
LBP 98720.483217
LKR 323.775322
LRD 212.77673
LSL 19.259673
LTL 3.238257
LVL 0.66338
LYD 5.2573
MAD 10.783014
MDL 19.341747
MGA 5049.367516
MKD 61.620081
MMK 3562.023988
MNT 3726.571033
MOP 8.81575
MRU 43.647272
MUR 51.128217
MVR 16.834624
MWK 1911.581977
MXN 21.094975
MYR 4.690019
MZN 70.068203
NAD 19.259673
NGN 1776.646446
NIO 40.570028
NOK 11.688838
NPR 148.015569
NZD 1.780552
OMR 0.422269
PAB 1.102444
PEN 4.106672
PGK 4.390921
PHP 62.322464
PKR 305.917695
PLN 4.316361
PYG 8593.221772
QAR 4.0195
RON 4.979878
RSD 117.041549
RUB 105.028293
RWF 1493.617107
SAR 4.119572
SBD 9.079227
SCR 15.215504
SDG 659.71276
SEK 11.377288
SGD 1.431193
SHP 0.835198
SLE 25.056533
SLL 22997.149251
SOS 629.996319
SRD 34.227657
STD 22699.381251
SVC 9.645881
SYP 2755.480107
SZL 19.251776
THB 36.721697
TJS 11.74146
TMT 3.849401
TND 3.37231
TOP 2.568574
TRY 37.567944
TTD 7.476583
TWD 35.356392
TZS 2983.011961
UAH 45.386026
UGX 4042.692979
USD 1.096695
UYU 46.108456
UZS 14045.459039
VEF 3972836.82162
VES 40.56592
VND 27250.13978
VUV 130.201885
WST 3.067965
XAF 655.744995
XAG 0.034408
XAU 0.000415
XCD 2.963874
XDR 0.819835
XOF 655.744995
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.503125
ZAR 19.148516
ZMK 9871.576838
ZMW 29.020618
ZWL 353.135482
  • RBGPF

    58.9400

    58.94

    +100%

  • BCC

    0.6100

    138.9

    +0.44%

  • SCS

    0.3500

    12.97

    +2.7%

  • NGG

    -0.4700

    66.5

    -0.71%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    24.7

    -0.16%

  • VOD

    -0.0300

    9.66

    -0.31%

  • RYCEF

    0.0000

    6.98

    0%

  • RIO

    -0.1300

    69.7

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    -0.3200

    46.29

    -0.69%

  • AZN

    -0.4600

    77.47

    -0.59%

  • BTI

    0.1800

    35.29

    +0.51%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.28

    -0.15%

  • GSK

    0.4500

    38.82

    +1.16%

  • BP

    0.4200

    32.88

    +1.28%

  • CMSD

    -0.0770

    24.813

    -0.31%

  • BCE

    -0.1300

    33.71

    -0.39%

In EU, a food fight over nutrition labels
In EU, a food fight over nutrition labels / Photo: LOIC VENANCE - AFP/File

In EU, a food fight over nutrition labels

Europe is taking longer than planned to concoct an EU-wide food-labelling system after a colour-coded scheme created in France did not go down well in culinary rival Italy.

Text size:

Fearing that cultural icons such as olive oil or Parmesan cheese would get bad grades, Italy successfully rallied other European Union nations to reject the French system.

The European Commission was supposed to come up by late 2022 with a label aimed at helping consumer make healthier food choices.

France's Nutri-Score system was initially seen as the front-runner to be used across the 27-nation EU. The front-of-pack nutrition label has already been adopted by Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Spain.

Nutri-Score ranks food products on a green-to-red and A-to-E scale based on their nutritional value, from containing a good amount of protein or fibre to too much salt or saturated fat, but companies are not obligated to use the label.

Some 270 scientists signed a call in March 2021 urging the European Commission "not to yield to pressure groups" and back Nutri-Score, saying it was the only label that had undergone peer-reviews showing its "effectiveness and relevance to consumers and public health".

But the European Commission decided against Nutri-Score, with its deputy director-general of food sustainability, Claire Bury, saying in September that it would not put on the table something that "polarizes the debates".

- 'E' for cheese -

Italy, Cyprus, Greece, the Czech Republic, Romania and Hungary opposed the French system.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who took office in October, had lambasted such food labels as "discriminatory and penalising" for the country's food industry.

"An intensive lobbying campaign against this tool by commercial interests has regrettably muddied the waters and turned a public health debate into a political one," said Emma Calvert, senior food policy officer at European consumers group BEUC.

While the European Commission may still use Nutri-Score for inspiration in devising a system, it is also looking at other labels.

Those include the green or black "Keyhole" system in Nordic countries and one backed by Italy, NutrInform Battery, which takes into account the potential portions of food consumed.

Italy has argued that Nutri-Score is not a good reference because it is based on 100 grams or 100 millilitres of food while certain products such as oil and cheese are consumed in smaller quantities.

Rome worries that labels would be harmful to products that are staples of its Mediterranean diet, including olive oil, cheese, prosciutto and pizza.

Italy's main agriculture association, Coldiretti, has said that Nutri-Score ends up "excluding healthy and natural foods that have been at the table for centuries in favour of artificial products".

In France, the makers of the blue cheese Bleu d'Auvergne refuse to put the label their product, which would get the worst possible grade, a red E, for its salt and fat content.

"How do you explain that Bleu d'Auvergne is classified as E when chips made in oil get an A," said Sebastien Ramade, president of the Auvergne cheese association.

But 875 brands representing 60 percent of the food market in France are using Nutri-Score, the system's founder, nutritionist Serge Hercberg told AFP.

"Some major brands still reject it, but more and more manufacturers are adopting it, some of whom had strongly resisted it in the past," Hercberg said.

"When we look at sales figures, we see that it works and it has had an effect on the reformulation and the improvement of the recipes for thousands of products," he added.

- Chile's strict label -

Time is running short for the commission to propose a label to EU states before the term of the current European Parliament expires next year.

"If the Commission fails to uphold its commitment to propose a mandatory EU-wide front-of-pack nutrition label it will be a major missed opportunity to help European consumers, especially vulnerable ones, to make the healthier choice in the supermarket," Calvert said.

Some members of the European Parliament say artificial foods should be targeted instead.

"The overweight issue among teenagers is not due to eating too much Camembert," said MEP Irene Tolleret.

Elsewhere in the world, Chile has had an even stricter system since 2016, with a black label that warns consumers about high saturated fats, sugar or salt.

Products in Chile that bear the label are barred from advertising on television.

"One of the consequences is that more than 20 percent of products have new formulas," with less salt or sugar, said Guido Girardi, a former senator behind the system who added that similar legislation is in the works in 32 countries.

(H.Schneide--BBZ)