Berliner Boersenzeitung - Censorship or evolution? 'Sensitivity readers' divide publishing world

EUR -
AED 4.033617
AFN 75.554907
ALL 98.773342
AMD 426.771233
ANG 1.987366
AOA 1013.616062
ARS 1072.26953
AUD 1.615469
AWG 1.976717
AZN 1.867904
BAM 1.955668
BBD 2.22645
BDT 131.771118
BGN 1.958133
BHD 0.413672
BIF 3199.184357
BMD 1.098176
BND 1.431304
BOB 7.619486
BRL 5.992953
BSD 1.102726
BTN 92.528763
BWP 14.586017
BYN 3.608657
BYR 21524.249143
BZD 2.22265
CAD 1.49006
CDF 3152.862717
CHF 0.941712
CLF 0.036817
CLP 1015.901522
CNY 7.707493
CNH 7.796173
COP 4619.988586
CRC 571.961447
CUC 1.098176
CUP 29.101663
CVE 110.257568
CZK 25.356331
DJF 196.356764
DKK 7.46046
DOP 66.31553
DZD 146.42813
EGP 53.084676
ERN 16.47264
ETB 131.915308
FJD 2.42966
FKP 0.836326
GBP 0.836929
GEL 3.008852
GGP 0.836326
GHS 17.444824
GIP 0.836326
GMD 75.774046
GNF 9520.358273
GTQ 8.532425
GYD 230.69445
HKD 8.528929
HNL 27.419152
HRK 7.466511
HTG 145.3902
HUF 401.421742
IDR 17208.417554
ILS 4.189701
IMP 0.836326
INR 92.280112
IQD 1444.502632
IRR 46238.699197
ISK 148.978431
JEP 0.836326
JMD 174.238255
JOD 0.77806
JPY 163.326188
KES 142.250412
KGS 93.015468
KHR 4475.698312
KMF 493.026299
KPW 988.357756
KRW 1479.100081
KWD 0.336404
KYD 0.918938
KZT 532.544103
LAK 24349.358714
LBP 98745.743973
LKR 323.85817
LRD 212.815655
LSL 19.264601
LTL 3.242628
LVL 0.664275
LYD 5.258646
MAD 10.785773
MDL 19.346696
MGA 5050.659557
MKD 61.615847
MMK 3566.832735
MNT 3731.601919
MOP 8.818006
MRU 43.655057
MUR 51.054664
MVR 16.857056
MWK 1912.071115
MXN 21.17336
MYR 4.635952
MZN 70.178646
NAD 19.264601
NGN 1798.461146
NIO 40.577265
NOK 11.712173
NPR 148.046021
NZD 1.782765
OMR 0.422831
PAB 1.102726
PEN 4.107723
PGK 4.391704
PHP 62.203437
PKR 305.995974
PLN 4.316123
PYG 8595.42062
QAR 4.020529
RON 4.982446
RSD 117.011113
RUB 105.064672
RWF 1493.999296
SAR 4.125057
SBD 9.091484
SCR 16.483445
SDG 660.54802
SEK 11.362536
SGD 1.431585
SHP 0.836326
SLE 25.090359
SLL 23028.195496
SOS 630.157524
SRD 34.267018
STD 22730.025509
SVC 9.64835
SYP 2759.200016
SZL 19.256702
THB 36.637895
TJS 11.743608
TMT 3.854598
TND 3.373173
TOP 2.572035
TRY 37.61664
TTD 7.478496
TWD 35.455679
TZS 3004.797459
UAH 45.39764
UGX 4043.72743
USD 1.098176
UYU 46.116891
UZS 14049.053014
VEF 3978200.167534
VES 40.620919
VND 27201.818942
VUV 130.377658
WST 3.072106
XAF 655.912788
XAG 0.034122
XAU 0.000414
XCD 2.967875
XDR 0.820045
XOF 655.912788
XPF 119.331742
YER 274.878595
ZAR 19.197489
ZMK 9884.905874
ZMW 29.028043
ZWL 353.612216
  • RELX

    -0.3200

    46.29

    -0.69%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    24.7

    -0.16%

  • RIO

    -0.1300

    69.7

    -0.19%

  • RYCEF

    0.0000

    6.98

    0%

  • SCS

    0.3500

    12.97

    +2.7%

  • NGG

    -0.4700

    66.5

    -0.71%

  • BP

    0.4200

    32.88

    +1.28%

  • RBGPF

    58.9400

    58.94

    +100%

  • BCC

    0.6100

    138.9

    +0.44%

  • AZN

    -0.4600

    77.47

    -0.59%

  • VOD

    -0.0300

    9.66

    -0.31%

  • BTI

    0.1800

    35.29

    +0.51%

  • GSK

    0.4500

    38.82

    +1.16%

  • CMSD

    -0.0770

    24.813

    -0.31%

  • BCE

    -0.1300

    33.71

    -0.39%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.28

    -0.15%

Censorship or evolution? 'Sensitivity readers' divide publishing world
Censorship or evolution? 'Sensitivity readers' divide publishing world / Photo: Brandon Bell - GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP/File

Censorship or evolution? 'Sensitivity readers' divide publishing world

It's a profession which is increasingly under the spotlight as the culture wars rumble on: "sensitivity readers" -- editors who identify insensitivities or stereotypes in manuscripts -- are becoming a lightning rod for the publishing industry.

Text size:

Such readers have worked in the wings of the Western literary world for years now, though they were largely confined to children's literature.

But amid social reckonings such as the #MeToo and Black Lives Matter movements, sensitivity readers are becoming prominent in contemporary fiction publishing also -- and not everyone is pleased about it.

Publishers "are doing a damn good job, trying to ruin our books, and to ruin our fun as readers," the American author of "We Need To Talk About Kevin," Lionel Shriver, complained on ultra-conservative British channel GB News last month.

Sensitivity readers have recently been pilloried again with the announcement that books by children's writer Roald Dahl and Ian Fleming, the author of the James Bond novels, were being republished to be more adapted to current sensibilities.

In Dahl's books, for example, some characters are no longer identified as "fat" or "crazy." Fleming's books were being reissued with racial references -- including the N-word -- removed.

Accusations of censorship began flying almost immediately from observers who fear sanitized literature could whitewash the past as well as the present.

"People say that, but I don't feel that they understand the process," Patrice Williams Marks, a Los Angeles-based sensitivity reader, tells AFP.

"If you're writing about a people or community that you're unfamiliar with, and you want it to be authentic... then you find somebody who's a sensitivity reader who's part of that community and ask for their opinions," she explains.

"I always let them know that they don't have to accept the changes that I suggest," says Lola Isabel Gonzalez, another sensitivity reader, also based in Los Angeles.

- Modern censors? -

So who are "sensitivity readers"?

Mostly they are freelance editors, often paid by the word or number of pages -- and with strict confidentiality clauses, of course -- by authors or publishers concerned about the accuracy of their manuscripts.

Or, as critics charge, to avoid at all costs the disaster of being canceled in a social media storm over a faux pas.

The proofreaders often list their areas of expertise: "child of immigrants," "bisexual," "autistic," "hijabi," "deaf," "expertise in both mainland Chinese and Hong Kong culture" and so on.

"There are good reasons for regulating children's reading: it is foundational and formational," British author Kate Clanchy wrote last year.

But she is much more circumspect when it comes to adults.

Adults "are able to put books down if they upset them, so their books may safely contain difficult ideas," argues Clanchy, who was herself at the center of a sensitivity reader controversy when her memoir was accused of being racist and insensitive.

For Shriver, who has long complained about such readers, they are nothing less than "sensitivity police."

"At the keyboard, unrelenting anguish about hurting other people's feelings inhibits spontaneity and constipates creativity," she wrote in The Guardian newspaper in 2017.

In France, a country widely resistant to this type of revisionism, the essayist Raphael Enthoven in 2020 denounced these "modern censors" as "the vanguard of the Identity Plague."

- Progress -

But many other writers are in favor of readers -- like the American Adele Holmes, who called on Marks's services for her first book, "Winter's Reckoning."

"Patrice was able to point out some areas of white privilege and the white savior role," Holmes told AFP.

And, more prosaically, for the character of a Black woman described as having "silky" hair, Marks suggested using the word "coil" instead, to make it more realistic.

Holmes feels that the proofreader helped her "immensely."

As for the criticisms, she argues they come from people who feel "threatened" by minorities, in a publishing world long known to be predominantly white.

For her part, Marks dates the renewed interest in her profession to the 2020 killing of George Floyd, an African American man, by a white police officer in Minneapolis. The murder ignited protests and a social reckoning on modern racism in the United States and around the world.

Since then, authors have "become more conscious of the lens that they're looking through," Marks told AFP.

Gonzalez also sees this increased care as reflecting social evolution.

"I don't think I could have done it professionally in any other decade," she says of her job, welcoming the fact that "Generation Z" is challenging established social narratives.

Those younger generations understand the importance of sensitivity reading, she argues -- as opposed to their elders, who might "have a harder time seeing it as progress."

(H.Schneide--BBZ)