Berliner Boersenzeitung - No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

EUR -
AED 4.104397
AFN 76.945413
ALL 99.231189
AMD 432.617988
ANG 2.010719
AOA 1036.724537
ARS 1075.538681
AUD 1.641361
AWG 2.011389
AZN 1.904081
BAM 1.955429
BBD 2.252673
BDT 133.324726
BGN 1.955529
BHD 0.42042
BIF 3234.286875
BMD 1.117438
BND 1.441627
BOB 7.709539
BRL 6.055052
BSD 1.115688
BTN 93.249023
BWP 14.748204
BYN 3.651208
BYR 21901.788071
BZD 2.248874
CAD 1.517202
CDF 3208.165381
CHF 0.949812
CLF 0.037689
CLP 1039.944272
CNY 7.880067
CNH 7.870123
COP 4641.820049
CRC 578.89026
CUC 1.117438
CUP 29.612111
CVE 110.244101
CZK 25.088056
DJF 198.672338
DKK 7.466279
DOP 66.967305
DZD 147.657009
EGP 54.142736
ERN 16.761573
ETB 129.466357
FJD 2.459262
FKP 0.850995
GBP 0.83876
GEL 3.051043
GGP 0.850995
GHS 17.539675
GIP 0.850995
GMD 76.548818
GNF 9639.172699
GTQ 8.624365
GYD 233.395755
HKD 8.704949
HNL 27.675753
HRK 7.597474
HTG 147.212093
HUF 393.517458
IDR 16941.25656
ILS 4.221139
IMP 0.850995
INR 93.284241
IQD 1461.522939
IRR 47035.770303
ISK 152.262556
JEP 0.850995
JMD 175.286771
JOD 0.791709
JPY 160.803866
KES 143.922717
KGS 94.13132
KHR 4531.14103
KMF 493.181764
KPW 1005.693717
KRW 1488.975611
KWD 0.340897
KYD 0.929724
KZT 534.908597
LAK 24636.329683
LBP 99909.860054
LKR 340.395471
LRD 223.1377
LSL 19.586187
LTL 3.299505
LVL 0.675928
LYD 5.297996
MAD 10.818149
MDL 19.468309
MGA 5046.04342
MKD 61.603322
MMK 3629.395577
MNT 3797.054841
MOP 8.955702
MRU 44.337595
MUR 51.268486
MVR 17.164273
MWK 1934.433289
MXN 21.697078
MYR 4.698871
MZN 71.348848
NAD 19.586187
NGN 1831.984424
NIO 41.062216
NOK 11.713438
NPR 149.198716
NZD 1.791484
OMR 0.429669
PAB 1.115688
PEN 4.181807
PGK 4.367172
PHP 62.188829
PKR 309.994034
PLN 4.274593
PYG 8704.349913
QAR 4.067529
RON 4.972492
RSD 117.203662
RUB 103.380402
RWF 1504.014883
SAR 4.193134
SBD 9.282489
SCR 14.578236
SDG 672.143165
SEK 11.364797
SGD 1.442952
SHP 0.850995
SLE 25.530448
SLL 23432.113894
SOS 637.579134
SRD 33.752262
STD 23128.713955
SVC 9.762149
SYP 2807.596846
SZL 19.593286
THB 36.793929
TJS 11.859752
TMT 3.911034
TND 3.380559
TOP 2.617156
TRY 38.132438
TTD 7.588561
TWD 35.736832
TZS 3045.822602
UAH 46.114158
UGX 4133.216465
USD 1.117438
UYU 46.101261
UZS 14197.308611
VEF 4047978.463464
VES 41.096875
VND 27494.566096
VUV 132.664504
WST 3.125992
XAF 655.832674
XAG 0.035881
XAU 0.000426
XCD 3.019933
XDR 0.826843
XOF 655.832674
XPF 119.331742
YER 279.722751
ZAR 19.426272
ZMK 10058.288435
ZMW 29.537401
ZWL 359.814634
  • CMSD

    0.0100

    25.02

    +0.04%

  • BCC

    -7.1900

    137.5

    -5.23%

  • SCS

    -0.3900

    12.92

    -3.02%

  • JRI

    -0.0800

    13.32

    -0.6%

  • RBGPF

    58.8300

    58.83

    +100%

  • CMSC

    0.0300

    25.15

    +0.12%

  • NGG

    0.7200

    69.55

    +1.04%

  • RIO

    -1.6100

    63.57

    -2.53%

  • BTI

    -0.1300

    37.44

    -0.35%

  • BCE

    -0.1500

    35.04

    -0.43%

  • GSK

    -0.8200

    40.8

    -2.01%

  • AZN

    -0.5200

    78.38

    -0.66%

  • VOD

    -0.0500

    10.01

    -0.5%

  • RELX

    -0.1400

    47.99

    -0.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.0200

    6.97

    +0.29%

  • BP

    -0.1200

    32.64

    -0.37%

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air
No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

To save the world from the worst ravages of climate change, slashing carbon pollution is no longer enough -- CO2 will also need to be sucked out of the atmosphere and buried, a landmark UN report is expected to say on Monday.

Text size:

If humanity had started to curb greenhouse gas emissions 20 years ago, an annual decrease of two percent out to 2030 would have put us on the right path. Challenging, but doable.

Instead, the emissions climbed another 20 percent to more than 40 billion tonnes of CO2 in 2021.

This means an abrupt drop in emissions of six or seven percent a year is needed to avoid breaching the Paris climate treaty's goal of capping global warming at "well below" two degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels.

Staying under the safer aspirational threshold of 1.5C would mean an even steeper decline.

To put that in perspective, the painful 2020 shutdown of the global economy due to Covid saw "only" a 5.6 percent decrease in CO2 emissions.

Hence the need for carbon dioxide removal (CDR), or "negative emissions", likely to figure prominently in the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.

Even under the most aggressive carbon-cutting scenarios, several billion tonnes of CO2 will need to be extracted each year from the atmosphere by 2050, and an accumulated total of hundreds of billions of tonnes by 2100.

As of today, however, CO2 removal is nowhere near these levels. The largest direct air capture facility in the world removes in a year what humanity emits in three or four seconds.

There are at least a dozen CDR techniques on the table, with different potentials and costs.

- Using bioenergy -

Most of the hundreds of models laying out a game plan for a liveable future reserve an important role for a negative emissions solution called BECCS, or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage.

In a nutshell, this is the recipe: grow trees, burn them for energy, and bury the CO2 underground, in an abandoned mineshaft, for example.

But what works on paper (or in so-called integrated assessment models), has not materialised in reality.

One of the few commercial-scale BECCS facilities in the world, in Britain, was dropped last year from the S&P Clean Energy Index because it failed to meet sustainability criteria.

"I don't see a BECCS boom," said Oliver Geden, a senior fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs and an expert on CDR.

- Planting trees -

Restoring forests and planting trees that absorb and stock CO2 as they grow also figure prominently in development scenarios achieving net-zero emissions, whether in 2050 or later.

Many businesses, including fossil fuel companies, rely heavily on carbon offset schemes based on afforestation to compensate for continuing carbon pollution.

But the amount of land needed to put a serious dent in CO2 levels through tree planting -- up to twice the size of India -- could clash with other priorities, such as growing food and biofuel crops.

Biodiversity could suffer as well, especially in savannahs converted to monoculture tree farms.

Newly planted forests could also fall victim to wildfires made more frequent and intense by rising temperatures, resulting in the release of all their stored CO2.

- 'DACCS' -

One of the youngest CDR technologies is also one of the hottest: direct air carbon capture and storage.

With variations, DACCS is a chemical process that extracts carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere, converting it into solid form or locking it away underground.

Because CO2 in the air is so sparse -- a few hundred parts per million -- it is a very energy-intensive and expensive process.

DACCS has benefited from a wave of corporate backing.

Last year, Tesla CEO Elon Musk launched the $100-million X-Prize for an innovative CO2 removal technology, and Breakthrough Energy founder Bill Gates unveiled a corporate partnership to turbocharge its development.

How quickly it can scale up, and at what cost, remain open questions.

- Enhanced weathering -

Enhanced weathering involves mining and crushing rocks rich in minerals that naturally absorb CO2, and then spreading them over land or sea.

It aims to vastly accelerate a process that normally unfolds on geological timescales of tens of thousands of years.

Silicate rocks with minerals rich in calcium and magnesium but lacking metal ions such as nickel and chromium are the best raw material for the job.

But, again, it's unclear if enhanced weathering can be scaled up enough, and at what cost.

- Ocean-based methods -

Oceans already take up more than 30 percent of humanity's carbon emissions, and scientists are experimenting with ways to boost that capacity.

One approach is to enhance marine alkalinity, either by directly adding natural or synthetic alkaline minerals, or the electrochemical processing of seawater.

Another approach, known as ocean fertilisation, increases the density of tiny phytoplankton that produce and sequester organic carbon through photosynthesis, like plants on land. Adding nitrogen or iron stimulate phytoplankton growth.

The main concerns here include unintended consequences on ecosystems.

(P.Werner--BBZ)