Berliner Boersenzeitung - Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford

EUR -
AED 4.100449
AFN 75.91327
ALL 99.189323
AMD 432.437101
ANG 2.012667
AOA 1045.484666
ARS 1077.561675
AUD 1.621879
AWG 2.009466
AZN 1.898653
BAM 1.962692
BBD 2.254818
BDT 133.448597
BGN 1.955993
BHD 0.420725
BIF 3231.891338
BMD 1.11637
BND 1.439153
BOB 7.717098
BRL 6.094602
BSD 1.116721
BTN 93.426261
BWP 14.674529
BYN 3.654633
BYR 21880.853275
BZD 2.251004
CAD 1.501032
CDF 3198.960795
CHF 0.942771
CLF 0.036962
CLP 1019.904928
CNY 7.850205
CNH 7.835891
COP 4632.991588
CRC 579.735706
CUC 1.11637
CUP 29.583807
CVE 110.900829
CZK 25.084166
DJF 198.401018
DKK 7.45671
DOP 67.400865
DZD 147.73061
EGP 54.368328
ERN 16.745551
ETB 134.04812
FJD 2.441334
FKP 0.850182
GBP 0.833181
GEL 3.042099
GGP 0.850182
GHS 17.694439
GIP 0.850182
GMD 76.455991
GNF 9626.45927
GTQ 8.632312
GYD 233.640414
HKD 8.691114
HNL 27.763611
HRK 7.590212
HTG 147.578212
HUF 394.351581
IDR 16921.546716
ILS 4.187264
IMP 0.850182
INR 93.356218
IQD 1462.444785
IRR 46990.803228
ISK 151.133962
JEP 0.850182
JMD 176.228817
JOD 0.79117
JPY 160.127101
KES 144.011805
KGS 94.023142
KHR 4549.207868
KMF 493.379948
KPW 1004.732426
KRW 1484.515246
KWD 0.340672
KYD 0.930668
KZT 535.580659
LAK 24652.244563
LBP 100026.757793
LKR 338.368159
LRD 216.436212
LSL 19.357673
LTL 3.29635
LVL 0.675281
LYD 5.302448
MAD 10.798653
MDL 19.492447
MGA 5073.901851
MKD 61.538587
MMK 3625.926424
MNT 3793.425431
MOP 8.955447
MRU 44.342426
MUR 51.207528
MVR 17.147965
MWK 1938.017944
MXN 21.623363
MYR 4.637365
MZN 71.280842
NAD 19.358012
NGN 1816.896102
NIO 41.054447
NOK 11.630438
NPR 149.481897
NZD 1.762727
OMR 0.429769
PAB 1.116721
PEN 4.209835
PGK 4.373101
PHP 62.507234
PKR 310.183776
PLN 4.256119
PYG 8691.519739
QAR 4.064425
RON 4.975886
RSD 117.087873
RUB 103.596342
RWF 1498.168627
SAR 4.188145
SBD 9.276735
SCR 15.076033
SDG 671.495537
SEK 11.288115
SGD 1.434078
SHP 0.850182
SLE 25.506045
SLL 23409.716338
SOS 637.447567
SRD 33.76908
STD 23106.606404
SVC 9.771311
SYP 2804.913208
SZL 19.357807
THB 36.514793
TJS 11.870884
TMT 3.907295
TND 3.413304
TOP 2.614655
TRY 38.09725
TTD 7.598682
TWD 35.609956
TZS 3048.806245
UAH 46.140118
UGX 4131.507535
USD 1.11637
UYU 46.563505
UZS 14250.464136
VEF 4044109.208466
VES 41.044399
VND 27468.28545
VUV 132.537697
WST 3.123004
XAF 658.268469
XAG 0.034687
XAU 0.000421
XCD 3.017046
XDR 0.826101
XOF 658.094866
XPF 119.331742
YER 279.426294
ZAR 19.341117
ZMK 10048.668719
ZMW 29.621012
ZWL 359.470705
  • RYCEF

    0.0100

    7.07

    +0.14%

  • CMSC

    -0.0370

    25.0331

    -0.15%

  • RBGPF

    3.1000

    60.1

    +5.16%

  • SCS

    0.1450

    13.155

    +1.1%

  • CMSD

    -0.0120

    24.993

    -0.05%

  • RIO

    3.0300

    67.61

    +4.48%

  • BTI

    0.2290

    38.129

    +0.6%

  • GSK

    0.0700

    40.93

    +0.17%

  • NGG

    -0.1500

    70.33

    -0.21%

  • BP

    -0.0410

    32.819

    -0.12%

  • RELX

    -0.3650

    48.495

    -0.75%

  • VOD

    -0.0100

    10.1

    -0.1%

  • JRI

    0.0900

    13.39

    +0.67%

  • BCE

    0.0000

    35.1

    0%

  • BCC

    -0.6900

    140.96

    -0.49%

  • AZN

    -0.1900

    76.95

    -0.25%

Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford
Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford / Photo: Prince of Wales - KENSINGTON PALACE/AFP

Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford

When the UK's Daily Mail, a loyal champion of the monarchy, splashes the headline "How did Kate photo become a PR disaster?", it is clear the royal family has a problem.

Text size:

In an extraordinary episode for the family, Catherine, Princess of Wales, on Monday apologised and admitted to editing an official portrait of her released by the palace on Sunday.

The edits had prompted AFP and other agencies to withdraw the altered image.

Kate, 42, has not been seen at a public event since attending a Christmas Day church service, and underwent abdominal surgery in January, fuelling speculation about her health.

The photograph dominated the front pages of UK newspapers landing on doormats on Monday, which had gone to print before the alterations were detected.

The Sun tabloid ran with the headline "Looking Great, Kate", adding the picture "puts online rumours to bed".

But the rumour mill instead went into overdrive when the photographs were pulled late on Sunday.

Not only has the incident intensified speculation over Catherine's health but it has tested the bond of trust between the royal family and friendly media outlets.

Even the Press Association, which has among the closest working relationships with the monarchy, killed its distribution of the photograph.

Daily Mail columnist Richard Kay warned that "trust and integrity are precious commodities" in maintaining the public support that underpins the institution.

- 'Suspicions' -

Royal-supporting tabloids would normally have "waited for it to blow over", Laura Clancy, lecturer in media at Lancaster University, told AFP.

Other outlets have also often been reluctant to dip into royal controversy over fear they could lose access, she added.

But the rise of social media now means that "people can question and talk about it and there's news outlets around the world who don't stick to that line".

In the digital media age, "any manipulation of an image, even relatively minor edits done with no intention to mislead, can raise suspicions", Chris Morris, chief executive of fact-checking service Full Fact, said in a comment sent to AFP.

Part of the problem is that the family distributes pictures from self-described "amateur photographer" Catherine for use by professional media outlets, which have strict rules on using manipulated images.

While there have been calls to use professionals, "there are some ... individuals whose brand is based on authenticity", explained Hannah Perry, lead digital researcher at the London-based think tank Demos.

But royals must weigh that up against the fact that "trust is so low in public institutions and we know that people are becoming incredibly sceptical and also savvy" about analysing information, she added.

"The best-case scenario in that situation would be to be transparent," suggested Perry.

On the streets of London, public reaction was mixed.

- 'Obsessive need for secrecy' -

"I was actually quite shocked. I would think it would be a lot more seamless coming from such an official source," said 21-year-old student Flora Canavan.

She added that her trust in the royal family had not been eroded as "I don't think I trusted them beforehand".

However, solicitor Jen Chambers said the incident had been "massively blown up out of proportion" and that "the kids probably weren't pulling good faces in the photo".

Although the furore has caused embarrassment for loyal media outlets, they still remain supportive, for now.

The Sun's front page on Tuesday urged "social media trolls, idiotic conspiracy theorists and sniping media critics" to "lay off Kate".

It accused critics of waging "a bullying campaign against a devoted mum, recovering from a serious operation, who simply wanted to offer the public a perfect portrait of her and her kids".

While the Daily Mail's Kay said it was "easy to see why the couple acted as they did", he offered a stark warning.

"They are down to earth and unshowy. But it is this desire for ordinariness which conceals one significant flaw: a near obsessive need for secrecy.

"If pictures can be digitally altered, what else can be twisted? The British public adore the Royal Family but that adoration rests on them being told the truth.

"There are precious commodities at stake here: trust and integrity."

(B.Hartmann--BBZ)