Berliner Boersenzeitung - 'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

EUR -
AED 4.104397
AFN 76.945413
ALL 99.231189
AMD 432.617988
ANG 2.010719
AOA 1036.724537
ARS 1074.259252
AUD 1.641361
AWG 2.011389
AZN 1.904081
BAM 1.955429
BBD 2.252673
BDT 133.324726
BGN 1.95472
BHD 0.42042
BIF 3234.286875
BMD 1.117438
BND 1.441627
BOB 7.709539
BRL 6.162788
BSD 1.115688
BTN 93.249023
BWP 14.748204
BYN 3.651208
BYR 21901.788071
BZD 2.248874
CAD 1.517202
CDF 3208.165381
CHF 0.950204
CLF 0.037689
CLP 1039.944272
CNY 7.880067
CNH 7.870123
COP 4641.820049
CRC 578.89026
CUC 1.117438
CUP 29.612111
CVE 110.244101
CZK 25.088056
DJF 198.672338
DKK 7.466767
DOP 66.967305
DZD 147.657009
EGP 54.142736
ERN 16.761573
ETB 129.466357
FJD 2.459262
FKP 0.850995
GBP 0.839107
GEL 3.051043
GGP 0.850995
GHS 17.539675
GIP 0.850995
GMD 76.548818
GNF 9639.172699
GTQ 8.624365
GYD 233.395755
HKD 8.704949
HNL 27.675753
HRK 7.597474
HTG 147.212093
HUF 393.517458
IDR 16941.25656
ILS 4.221139
IMP 0.850995
INR 93.284241
IQD 1461.522939
IRR 47035.770303
ISK 152.262556
JEP 0.850995
JMD 175.286771
JOD 0.791709
JPY 160.803866
KES 143.922717
KGS 94.13132
KHR 4531.14103
KMF 493.181764
KPW 1005.693717
KRW 1488.975611
KWD 0.340897
KYD 0.929724
KZT 534.908597
LAK 24636.329683
LBP 99909.860054
LKR 340.395471
LRD 223.1377
LSL 19.586187
LTL 3.299505
LVL 0.675928
LYD 5.297996
MAD 10.818149
MDL 19.468309
MGA 5046.04342
MKD 61.603322
MMK 3629.395577
MNT 3797.054841
MOP 8.955702
MRU 44.337595
MUR 51.268486
MVR 17.164273
MWK 1934.433289
MXN 21.697078
MYR 4.698871
MZN 71.348848
NAD 19.586187
NGN 1831.984424
NIO 41.062216
NOK 11.713438
NPR 149.198716
NZD 1.791484
OMR 0.429669
PAB 1.115688
PEN 4.181807
PGK 4.367172
PHP 62.188829
PKR 309.994034
PLN 4.274593
PYG 8704.349913
QAR 4.067529
RON 4.972492
RSD 117.203662
RUB 103.07316
RWF 1504.014883
SAR 4.193134
SBD 9.282489
SCR 14.578236
SDG 672.143165
SEK 11.364797
SGD 1.442952
SHP 0.850995
SLE 25.530448
SLL 23432.113894
SOS 637.579134
SRD 33.752262
STD 23128.713955
SVC 9.762149
SYP 2807.596846
SZL 19.593286
THB 36.793929
TJS 11.859752
TMT 3.911034
TND 3.380559
TOP 2.617156
TRY 38.132438
TTD 7.588561
TWD 35.736832
TZS 3045.822602
UAH 46.114158
UGX 4133.216465
USD 1.117438
UYU 46.101261
UZS 14197.308611
VEF 4047978.463464
VES 41.096875
VND 27494.566096
VUV 132.664504
WST 3.125992
XAF 655.832674
XAG 0.035881
XAU 0.000426
XCD 3.019933
XDR 0.826843
XOF 655.832674
XPF 119.331742
YER 279.722751
ZAR 19.426272
ZMK 10058.288435
ZMW 29.537401
ZWL 359.814634
  • CMSD

    0.0100

    25.02

    +0.04%

  • SCS

    -0.3900

    12.92

    -3.02%

  • GSK

    -0.8200

    40.8

    -2.01%

  • BCC

    -7.1900

    137.5

    -5.23%

  • RBGPF

    58.8300

    58.83

    +100%

  • NGG

    0.7200

    69.55

    +1.04%

  • RYCEF

    0.0200

    6.97

    +0.29%

  • JRI

    -0.0800

    13.32

    -0.6%

  • BCE

    -0.1500

    35.04

    -0.43%

  • CMSC

    0.0300

    25.15

    +0.12%

  • RIO

    -1.6100

    63.57

    -2.53%

  • RELX

    -0.1400

    47.99

    -0.29%

  • BTI

    -0.1300

    37.44

    -0.35%

  • AZN

    -0.5200

    78.38

    -0.66%

  • VOD

    -0.0500

    10.01

    -0.5%

  • BP

    -0.1200

    32.64

    -0.37%

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths
'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths / Photo: Stefani Reynolds - AFP

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

Wracked by guilt after taking an abortion pill, a sobbing woman calls a US hotline. It recommends a "reversal" treatment to save the fetus -- despite medical warnings that it is potentially life-threatening.

Text size:

Misinformation about medical termination appears to have skyrocketed since last June, when the Supreme Court overturned the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that guaranteed a constitutional right to abortion.

That includes false "pro-life" posts on social media claiming abortion pills cause cancer and infertility -- as well as "pro-choice" content promoting dubious herbal treatments to terminate a pregnancy.

More striking, researchers say, is a wave of misleading content that promotes an unscientific treatment that promises to undo the effects of the first pill, mifepristone, in the two-drug regimen for medical abortion.

Anti-abortion advocates in the United States have heralded the so-called "reversal" treatment -- which involves taking the hormone progesterone -- for women who change their minds after taking mifepristone.

"Abortion pill reversal can help turn back the clock," reads the website for the Abortion Pill Rescue Network (APRN), a pro-life outfit that supports the treatment.

"When destructive voices would only say 'it is done,' abortion pill reversal says 'here is a second chance at life, just in time.'"

APRN's website lists anecdotal "success stories" -- emotional testimonies from women who opted for the treatment. Some, including a single mother identified as Shashana, broke down after taking the first pill, consumed with regret.

She reached out to APRN's hotline that got her started on the "reversal" procedure that her written testimony says saved her fetus.

What is not mentioned is the warning from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG), an association of reproductive health specialists, that calls the treatment "unproven," "unethical" and "not based on science."

Also omitted is a 2019 medical trial by researchers from the University of California, Davis, to test the effectiveness of the "reversal" treatment. The trial had to be stopped prematurely after some participants experienced severe internal bleeding.

- 'Potential to harm' -

"The anecdotal 'success stories' often fail to acknowledge that there is no reputable medical evidence that taking progesterone to reverse the effects of mifepristone increases the likelihood of a pregnancy continuing," Anicka Slachta, a senior analyst at the watchdog NewsGuard, told AFP.

"Ultimately, omitting that context and presenting abortion pill 'reversal' as definitively safe and effective has the potential to cause harm."

When AFP requested APRN provide supporting data and interviews with the women cited under the "success stories," a publicist for Heartbeat International, an anti-abortion group that backs the network, replied.

She inquired what AFP's article intended to highlight but stopped responding thereafter.

When a US health misinformation researcher reached APRN's hotline posing as a pregnant woman, she was told the network had successfully saved 4,000 babies through the "reversal" treatment.

The hotline operator did not reveal the number of unsuccessful cases but mentioned a success rate of 64-68 percent, a statistic also cited on the network's website.

When the researcher -- who shared the audio recording with AFP -- pointed out that ACOG did not consider the treatment as safe, the operator dismissed the organization as "very pro-abortion," a stance that makes them "biased."

The operator said a prayer that she "make the right decision" -– that is, not carry out the abortion.

- 'Bodily autonomy' -

"What was clear in the call is that this group cares more about the life of the baby than the mother, point blank," the researcher told AFP, requesting anonymity for fear of online harassment.

"That was evident in the way they referred to the fetus but also through the omission of any real data about the risks."

In a report last week, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) said thousands of "fake clinics" across the United States -- which seek to prevent "abortion-determined" people from accessing care -- collectively spent $10.2 million on Google search ads over the past two years.

Many of them, it said, promoted the "potentially dangerous" reversal procedure.

Research by the technology nonprofit Meedan Digital Health Lab shows that in the months after Roe v. Wade was overturned, online conversations about pill "reversals" were among three topics associated with abortion misinformation that saw a dramatic surge.

"It's not the idea of someone changing their mind on their own about having an abortion that's dangerous," Jenna Sherman, a program manager at the nonprofit, told AFP.

"It's pushing an unverified and potentially life-threatening intervention in an effort to be anti-abortion first and foremost over everything, rather than support people's bodily autonomy."

(F.Schuster--BBZ)