Berliner Boersenzeitung - 'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

EUR -
AED 4.30511
AFN 81.83978
ALL 97.811889
AMD 449.87212
ANG 2.097616
AOA 1074.815474
ARS 1479.145696
AUD 1.792474
AWG 2.109779
AZN 1.990983
BAM 1.953408
BBD 2.365104
BDT 142.908653
BGN 1.954031
BHD 0.441768
BIF 3489.956005
BMD 1.1721
BND 1.497579
BOB 8.094088
BRL 6.410097
BSD 1.171465
BTN 100.328139
BWP 15.639449
BYN 3.833438
BYR 22973.153276
BZD 2.352939
CAD 1.600684
CDF 3381.507455
CHF 0.935095
CLF 0.028788
CLP 1104.727546
CNY 8.409695
CNH 8.413536
COP 4726.023027
CRC 592.179874
CUC 1.1721
CUP 31.060641
CVE 110.132951
CZK 24.647322
DJF 208.605222
DKK 7.460778
DOP 70.283931
DZD 151.892564
EGP 58.229775
ERN 17.581495
ETB 162.568907
FJD 2.631008
FKP 0.859549
GBP 0.863366
GEL 3.176962
GGP 0.859549
GHS 12.211046
GIP 0.859549
GMD 83.802376
GNF 10159.818416
GTQ 9.003205
GYD 245.08242
HKD 9.200947
HNL 30.63049
HRK 7.53193
HTG 153.741729
HUF 399.552391
IDR 19071.467938
ILS 3.932418
IMP 0.859549
INR 100.42333
IQD 1534.520839
IRR 49374.697814
ISK 142.632717
JEP 0.859549
JMD 186.965829
JOD 0.830996
JPY 171.662789
KES 151.353273
KGS 102.50019
KHR 4703.320609
KMF 492.866506
KPW 1054.887442
KRW 1606.204357
KWD 0.358088
KYD 0.976246
KZT 608.664635
LAK 25235.312355
LBP 104954.373784
LKR 352.147776
LRD 234.874398
LSL 20.83412
LTL 3.460905
LVL 0.708992
LYD 6.327413
MAD 10.549551
MDL 19.826482
MGA 5173.708462
MKD 61.489079
MMK 2460.487866
MNT 4206.445893
MOP 9.471986
MRU 46.52222
MUR 52.873493
MVR 18.052229
MWK 2031.216568
MXN 21.856928
MYR 4.970875
MZN 74.968234
NAD 20.833587
NGN 1794.167808
NIO 43.108313
NOK 11.826972
NPR 160.52679
NZD 1.949616
OMR 0.450677
PAB 1.171376
PEN 4.176592
PGK 4.91211
PHP 66.194916
PKR 333.027701
PLN 4.244522
PYG 9335.806403
QAR 4.27058
RON 5.069803
RSD 117.18064
RUB 91.778583
RWF 1692.713768
SAR 4.396117
SBD 9.771706
SCR 17.196327
SDG 703.84246
SEK 11.165263
SGD 1.499356
SHP 0.921086
SLE 26.375943
SLL 24578.348051
SOS 669.49157
SRD 43.663636
STD 24260.096439
SVC 10.249711
SYP 15239.485159
SZL 20.825675
THB 38.140707
TJS 11.251497
TMT 4.11407
TND 3.416217
TOP 2.745174
TRY 46.91166
TTD 7.947336
TWD 34.106107
TZS 3097.49837
UAH 48.929234
UGX 4210.843438
USD 1.1721
UYU 47.033607
UZS 14849.19587
VES 130.433887
VND 30632.824534
VUV 139.27358
WST 3.212126
XAF 655.165869
XAG 0.031919
XAU 0.000352
XCD 3.167658
XDR 0.814174
XOF 655.171452
XPF 119.331742
YER 283.823824
ZAR 20.838795
ZMK 10550.307503
ZMW 28.376251
ZWL 377.415611
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths
'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths / Photo: Stefani Reynolds - AFP

'Not based on science': US confronts abortion 'reversal' myths

Wracked by guilt after taking an abortion pill, a sobbing woman calls a US hotline. It recommends a "reversal" treatment to save the fetus -- despite medical warnings that it is potentially life-threatening.

Text size:

Misinformation about medical termination appears to have skyrocketed since last June, when the Supreme Court overturned the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that guaranteed a constitutional right to abortion.

That includes false "pro-life" posts on social media claiming abortion pills cause cancer and infertility -- as well as "pro-choice" content promoting dubious herbal treatments to terminate a pregnancy.

More striking, researchers say, is a wave of misleading content that promotes an unscientific treatment that promises to undo the effects of the first pill, mifepristone, in the two-drug regimen for medical abortion.

Anti-abortion advocates in the United States have heralded the so-called "reversal" treatment -- which involves taking the hormone progesterone -- for women who change their minds after taking mifepristone.

"Abortion pill reversal can help turn back the clock," reads the website for the Abortion Pill Rescue Network (APRN), a pro-life outfit that supports the treatment.

"When destructive voices would only say 'it is done,' abortion pill reversal says 'here is a second chance at life, just in time.'"

APRN's website lists anecdotal "success stories" -- emotional testimonies from women who opted for the treatment. Some, including a single mother identified as Shashana, broke down after taking the first pill, consumed with regret.

She reached out to APRN's hotline that got her started on the "reversal" procedure that her written testimony says saved her fetus.

What is not mentioned is the warning from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG), an association of reproductive health specialists, that calls the treatment "unproven," "unethical" and "not based on science."

Also omitted is a 2019 medical trial by researchers from the University of California, Davis, to test the effectiveness of the "reversal" treatment. The trial had to be stopped prematurely after some participants experienced severe internal bleeding.

- 'Potential to harm' -

"The anecdotal 'success stories' often fail to acknowledge that there is no reputable medical evidence that taking progesterone to reverse the effects of mifepristone increases the likelihood of a pregnancy continuing," Anicka Slachta, a senior analyst at the watchdog NewsGuard, told AFP.

"Ultimately, omitting that context and presenting abortion pill 'reversal' as definitively safe and effective has the potential to cause harm."

When AFP requested APRN provide supporting data and interviews with the women cited under the "success stories," a publicist for Heartbeat International, an anti-abortion group that backs the network, replied.

She inquired what AFP's article intended to highlight but stopped responding thereafter.

When a US health misinformation researcher reached APRN's hotline posing as a pregnant woman, she was told the network had successfully saved 4,000 babies through the "reversal" treatment.

The hotline operator did not reveal the number of unsuccessful cases but mentioned a success rate of 64-68 percent, a statistic also cited on the network's website.

When the researcher -- who shared the audio recording with AFP -- pointed out that ACOG did not consider the treatment as safe, the operator dismissed the organization as "very pro-abortion," a stance that makes them "biased."

The operator said a prayer that she "make the right decision" -– that is, not carry out the abortion.

- 'Bodily autonomy' -

"What was clear in the call is that this group cares more about the life of the baby than the mother, point blank," the researcher told AFP, requesting anonymity for fear of online harassment.

"That was evident in the way they referred to the fetus but also through the omission of any real data about the risks."

In a report last week, the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) said thousands of "fake clinics" across the United States -- which seek to prevent "abortion-determined" people from accessing care -- collectively spent $10.2 million on Google search ads over the past two years.

Many of them, it said, promoted the "potentially dangerous" reversal procedure.

Research by the technology nonprofit Meedan Digital Health Lab shows that in the months after Roe v. Wade was overturned, online conversations about pill "reversals" were among three topics associated with abortion misinformation that saw a dramatic surge.

"It's not the idea of someone changing their mind on their own about having an abortion that's dangerous," Jenna Sherman, a program manager at the nonprofit, told AFP.

"It's pushing an unverified and potentially life-threatening intervention in an effort to be anti-abortion first and foremost over everything, rather than support people's bodily autonomy."

(F.Schuster--BBZ)