Berliner Boersenzeitung - UN aims to set standards for scandal-hit carbon markets

EUR -
AED 3.826681
AFN 70.961758
ALL 98.138602
AMD 405.652886
ANG 1.877182
AOA 951.190259
ARS 1045.840133
AUD 1.602814
AWG 1.877897
AZN 1.775245
BAM 1.955573
BBD 2.102956
BDT 124.465544
BGN 1.955633
BHD 0.392554
BIF 3076.642669
BMD 1.041829
BND 1.403837
BOB 7.197164
BRL 6.043693
BSD 1.041579
BTN 87.914489
BWP 14.229347
BYN 3.408604
BYR 20419.848375
BZD 2.099456
CAD 1.456529
CDF 2991.091432
CHF 0.930994
CLF 0.037254
CLP 1018.83097
CNY 7.54601
CNH 7.562783
COP 4573.368835
CRC 530.538382
CUC 1.041829
CUP 27.608468
CVE 110.252195
CZK 25.343745
DJF 185.478458
DKK 7.457729
DOP 62.772709
DZD 139.891631
EGP 51.726992
ERN 15.627435
ETB 127.508391
FJD 2.371151
FKP 0.822333
GBP 0.831468
GEL 2.855018
GGP 0.822333
GHS 16.456089
GIP 0.822333
GMD 73.970229
GNF 8977.957272
GTQ 8.040066
GYD 217.904692
HKD 8.109446
HNL 26.320943
HRK 7.431636
HTG 136.72412
HUF 411.522823
IDR 16610.452733
ILS 3.863061
IMP 0.822333
INR 87.968134
IQD 1364.44153
IRR 43834.955489
ISK 145.523076
JEP 0.822333
JMD 165.930728
JOD 0.738765
JPY 161.242873
KES 134.884334
KGS 90.122166
KHR 4193.512952
KMF 492.268155
KPW 937.645704
KRW 1463.259646
KWD 0.320727
KYD 0.867999
KZT 520.059599
LAK 22878.342838
LBP 93271.167197
LKR 303.144792
LRD 187.998165
LSL 18.795317
LTL 3.076251
LVL 0.630192
LYD 5.086409
MAD 10.478083
MDL 18.997794
MGA 4861.435378
MKD 61.522855
MMK 3383.819949
MNT 3540.134882
MOP 8.35093
MRU 41.443187
MUR 48.810083
MVR 16.10707
MWK 1806.090235
MXN 21.281613
MYR 4.654932
MZN 66.583684
NAD 18.795317
NGN 1767.675143
NIO 38.325549
NOK 11.531328
NPR 140.663663
NZD 1.78585
OMR 0.401144
PAB 1.041579
PEN 3.949541
PGK 4.193513
PHP 61.404399
PKR 289.239507
PLN 4.337676
PYG 8131.055634
QAR 3.798559
RON 4.978071
RSD 117.038068
RUB 108.671879
RWF 1421.834864
SAR 3.911473
SBD 8.734231
SCR 14.266343
SDG 626.663972
SEK 11.501974
SGD 1.402931
SHP 0.822333
SLE 23.68116
SLL 21846.638123
SOS 595.230868
SRD 36.978718
STD 21563.75683
SVC 9.113941
SYP 2617.626467
SZL 18.788818
THB 35.922648
TJS 11.092512
TMT 3.646401
TND 3.309016
TOP 2.440072
TRY 36.018972
TTD 7.074178
TWD 33.946439
TZS 2770.578216
UAH 43.089995
UGX 3848.553017
USD 1.041829
UYU 44.294855
UZS 13362.448044
VES 48.506662
VND 26482.251319
VUV 123.688032
WST 2.90836
XAF 655.880824
XAG 0.033274
XAU 0.000384
XCD 2.815595
XDR 0.792308
XOF 655.880824
XPF 119.331742
YER 260.379151
ZAR 18.862746
ZMK 9377.71492
ZMW 28.772658
ZWL 335.468513
  • RIO

    -0.2200

    62.35

    -0.35%

  • CMSC

    0.0320

    24.672

    +0.13%

  • SCS

    0.2300

    13.27

    +1.73%

  • BCC

    3.4200

    143.78

    +2.38%

  • BTI

    0.4000

    37.38

    +1.07%

  • GSK

    0.2600

    33.96

    +0.77%

  • CMSD

    0.0150

    24.46

    +0.06%

  • BCE

    0.0900

    26.77

    +0.34%

  • AZN

    1.3700

    65.63

    +2.09%

  • NGG

    1.0296

    63.11

    +1.63%

  • RBGPF

    59.2400

    59.24

    +100%

  • RELX

    0.9900

    46.75

    +2.12%

  • BP

    0.2000

    29.72

    +0.67%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.21

    -0.15%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0100

    6.79

    -0.15%

  • VOD

    0.1323

    8.73

    +1.52%

UN aims to set standards for scandal-hit carbon markets
UN aims to set standards for scandal-hit carbon markets / Photo: Juan Pablo Pino - AFP/File

UN aims to set standards for scandal-hit carbon markets

Governments could finally approve new UN standards for countries and companies wanting to trade carbon credits, a long-awaited decision some hope can bring credibility to a scandal-ridden sector.

Text size:

Carbon credits are generated by activities that reduce emissions, like tree planting or replacing polluting coal with renewable energy, but buyers have long relied on unregulated markets shaken by high-profile scandals.

At this month's COP29 climate summit in Azerbaijan, the UN hopes to approve rules and a verification system years in the making to provide some certainty for governments and businesses exchanging carbon credits.

In carbon markets, one credit equals a tonne of carbon dioxide prevented from entering, or removed from, the atmosphere.

The UN's proposed standards mostly relate to countries -- mainly wealthy polluters -- seeking to offset their emissions by purchasing credits from nations that have cut greenhouse gases above what they promised.

Climate negotiators have been mulling the idea since the 2015 Paris Agreement.

Observers say the November 11-22 UN talks could see a breakthrough, with a supervisory body expected to put fresh proposals for verifying carbon credits on the table.

"Most countries don't want it to be delayed any further," said Jonathan Crook, an expert with Carbon Market Watch, adding that there was "a lot of pressure" for the UN-backed carbon marketplace to get up and running.

Countries have already started to trade in carbon directly.

Earlier this year Switzerland bought credits from Thailand linked to emissions reduced by converting buses in Bangkok to electric power.

Observers say a regulated carbon market could provide much-needed additional revenue for developing countries to slash their own emissions without taking on more debt.

- Fraud claims -

An earlier UN foray into the regulation of carbon markets, known as Article Six, was rejected in Dubai in 2023 by the European Union and developing nations for being too lax.

This time around the supervisory body, which has spent months canvassing NGOs and specialists, say the rules are much more rigorous, and give local people the right to challenge credit-generating activities on their territory.

The new proposals include guidelines for future certification to ensure that a project either avoids the release of CO2 by human actions, or acts to remove the planet-heating gas from the atmosphere and store it over an extended period of time.

For example, owning an existing forest that naturally stores CO2 would not be credited, but efforts to protect it from a genuine threat of deforestation could be.

The plans set monitoring standards -- to check that trees are actually planted, or that the risks of a forest being ravaged by fire are properly taken into account.

The UN proposal includes plans for a fund, modelled on mutual insurance, which would see a percentage of each project's credits set aside in the event it fails to store carbon as promised.

The proposed rules still need to be approved at COP29.

This year, instead of giving negotiators the option of modifying the proposal texts, the specialist body has already adopted them for delegates to take or leave for another year.

Observers say it is possible that the text laying out standards for the voluntary system could pass more easily than decisions covering country-to-country carbon trading.

It follows collapsing confidence in the unregulated voluntary carbon market, where the credibility of many credits has come under scrutiny after allegations many did not deliver any benefit for the climate.

Some projects have been accused of fraud, while other forest-based initiatives have gone up in wildfire smoke, prompting an exodus of big corporate brands using these credits to claim carbon neutrality.

- 'New benchmark' -

The voluntary market, for its part, is eagerly awaiting a UN decision.

"We do expect that (it) will evolve to become a new benchmark for quality in the whole market," Karolien Casaer-Diez, an expert with South Pole, a consultancy that develops emission-reduction projects to sell credits.

That could boost standards across the board, she said, predicting "close and rapid alignment" with the new UN system from Verra and Gold Standard, the main private certifiers of carbon credits.

Crook said important provisions in the proposals include ensuring credits are not allocated to existing carbon stocks -- an unthreatened patch of forest, for example -- and that projects can show they do actually boost emission reductions.

But he said ambiguity remains in the wording that could leave texts open to interpretation, notably over tricky issues like estimating CO2 pollution over long periods of time.

"We know that the world is not perfect and that accurate risk assessments are complicated, if not impossible for many project types," he said.

The real test, he added, will come in putting the proposals into action.

(Y.Berger--BBZ)