Berliner Boersenzeitung - Apollo to Artemis: Why America is betting big on private space

EUR -
AED 4.269035
AFN 80.781812
ALL 97.456094
AMD 446.576198
ANG 2.080099
AOA 1065.794205
ARS 1494.414015
AUD 1.786168
AWG 2.092071
AZN 1.980459
BAM 1.952133
BBD 2.345793
BDT 141.045021
BGN 1.956323
BHD 0.43834
BIF 3400.777093
BMD 1.162261
BND 1.491298
BOB 8.027918
BRL 6.486005
BSD 1.161817
BTN 100.019096
BWP 15.598695
BYN 3.802157
BYR 22780.325028
BZD 2.333716
CAD 1.596192
CDF 3354.287055
CHF 0.932807
CLF 0.029182
CLP 1119.862642
CNY 8.342655
CNH 8.346165
COP 4657.181754
CRC 586.298532
CUC 1.162261
CUP 30.799929
CVE 110.589638
CZK 24.634179
DJF 206.557568
DKK 7.463699
DOP 70.259163
DZD 151.472937
EGP 57.439973
ERN 17.433922
ETB 158.653194
FJD 2.620788
FKP 0.866542
GBP 0.866519
GEL 3.150183
GGP 0.866542
GHS 12.116623
GIP 0.866542
GMD 83.106172
GNF 10060.535793
GTQ 8.920242
GYD 243.073343
HKD 9.117767
HNL 30.626041
HRK 7.532663
HTG 152.54342
HUF 398.923459
IDR 18977.696027
ILS 3.902549
IMP 0.866542
INR 100.129761
IQD 1522.56254
IRR 48945.741055
ISK 142.354235
JEP 0.866542
JMD 185.790958
JOD 0.824089
JPY 172.949203
KES 150.51728
KGS 101.640213
KHR 4672.291561
KMF 491.989694
KPW 1046.077104
KRW 1616.942576
KWD 0.355234
KYD 0.968181
KZT 619.356427
LAK 25064.169244
LBP 104080.516031
LKR 350.521482
LRD 233.614962
LSL 20.595717
LTL 3.431856
LVL 0.703041
LYD 6.311522
MAD 10.521377
MDL 19.762872
MGA 5148.818764
MKD 61.444565
MMK 2439.88243
MNT 4168.596049
MOP 9.392835
MRU 46.281692
MUR 53.119698
MVR 17.903172
MWK 2018.271404
MXN 21.795313
MYR 4.935007
MZN 74.338683
NAD 20.595712
NGN 1779.387897
NIO 42.713547
NOK 11.840776
NPR 160.030354
NZD 1.948796
OMR 0.447149
PAB 1.161817
PEN 4.142886
PGK 4.804212
PHP 66.377189
PKR 331.157397
PLN 4.244708
PYG 8992.106697
QAR 4.231334
RON 5.072695
RSD 117.06767
RUB 91.265035
RWF 1670.750879
SAR 4.359791
SBD 9.64543
SCR 16.424358
SDG 697.942292
SEK 11.235354
SGD 1.492697
SHP 0.913355
SLE 26.62005
SLL 24372.046713
SOS 664.236693
SRD 43.245469
STD 24056.466061
STN 24.843339
SVC 10.165902
SYP 15112.221726
SZL 20.595702
THB 37.634455
TJS 11.182492
TMT 4.079538
TND 3.367657
TOP 2.722137
TRY 46.923174
TTD 7.887182
TWD 34.181766
TZS 3028.605902
UAH 48.520146
UGX 4163.178714
USD 1.162261
UYU 46.822036
UZS 14728.762822
VES 135.943958
VND 30404.760344
VUV 139.137302
WST 3.060577
XAF 654.732599
XAG 0.030439
XAU 0.000347
XCD 3.14107
XCG 2.093866
XDR 0.81565
XOF 654.353599
XPF 119.331742
YER 280.163552
ZAR 20.584075
ZMK 10461.752209
ZMW 26.750744
ZWL 374.247723
  • CMSC

    0.0900

    22.314

    +0.4%

  • CMSD

    0.0250

    22.285

    +0.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.04

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    10.74

    +0.37%

  • RELX

    0.0300

    53

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.1400

    59.33

    -0.24%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    41.45

    +0.31%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    71.48

    +0.38%

  • BP

    0.1750

    30.4

    +0.58%

  • BTI

    0.7150

    48.215

    +1.48%

  • BCC

    0.7900

    91.02

    +0.87%

  • JRI

    0.0200

    13.13

    +0.15%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    9.85

    +0.1%

  • BCE

    -0.0600

    22.445

    -0.27%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    12

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    -0.1200

    73.71

    -0.16%

Apollo to Artemis: Why America is betting big on private space
Apollo to Artemis: Why America is betting big on private space / Photo: Luis ROBAYO - AFP/File

Apollo to Artemis: Why America is betting big on private space

A private Houston-based company is set this week to lead a mission to the Moon which, if successful, will mark America's first lunar landing since the end of the Apollo era five decades ago.

Text size:

Reputation will be on the line when Intuitive Machines' Nova-C spaceship will launch atop a SpaceX rocket on Wednesday, following recent completed touchdowns by China, India and Japan.

So why entrust such tasks to the commercial sector, especially after an attempt by another company with similar goals, Astrobotic, failed just last month?

The answer lies in the way NASA has fundamentally reorganized itself for Artemis, the agency's flagship Moon-to-Mars program.

During the Cold War, the space agency was handed blank checks and managed industrial contracts down to the last bolt -- but the new paradigm bets on America's mighty market economy to deliver breakthroughs at a fraction of historic costs.

While the current approach has borne some fruit, it also carries the risk of the United States falling behind its principal space rival, China, in achieving major milestones -- namely the next crewed mission to the Moon, and getting the first rocks back from Mars.

- SpaceX success -

The focus on fledgling companies under NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) initiative builds on the example set by the meteoric rise of SpaceX, which was derided in its startup phase as reckless, but is now arguably the agency's favorite contractor.

Scott Pace, a former member of the National Space Council, told AFP that NASA had intentionally adopted a policy that prioritized "more shots on goal" at lower costs.

"The reliability that SpaceX has now is as a result of painfully blowing up multiple rockets along the way," he said.

SpaceX launches are currently the only way astronauts launch from US soil, following the end of the NASA-led space shuttle program in 2011 that left NASA reliant on Russia's Soyuz rockets.

Elon Musk's company beat heavily-favored aerospace giant Boeing in certifying its system first, proving for experts the value of competition between companies providing different options.

Each space shuttle launch cost over $2 billion, adjusted for inflation, according to a study in the journal Nature, while the estimated average cost for NASA to buy a seat on a SpaceX flight is around $55 million, according to a government audit.

- On to Artemis -

During the Apollo era, NASA was given more than $300 billion, according to an analysis by Casey Dreier of the nonprofit Planetary Society -- far more than the $93 billion to be spent by 2025 on Artemis.

Rather than telling private industry exactly what to build, the agency now purchases services from companies -- though this at-times piecemeal approach carries certain drawbacks.

While NASA owns the giant Space Launch System (SLS) rocket and the Orion crew capsule, it has contracted with SpaceX an unconventional and as yet unproven landing system based on the company's next-generation Starship rocket, to provide the first crewed lunar touchdown.

Starship has yet to complete a flight test without blowing up -- and it requires ultra-cold refueling multiple times while in orbit before it travels to the Moon, independently of SLS, to dock with Orion and pick up the astronauts.

Futuristic space fuel depots could be a great way to facilitate long-range missions to Mars -- the founding ideal of SpaceX, which Musk pursues with messianic fervor -- but getting it right could well delay the return of American boots to the Moon.

NASA has said this could take place by 2026 at the earliest, though that timeline threatens to drag. China, meanwhile, has set a deadline of 2030 for its own crewed landing -- and has lately stuck to its promises.

The Chinese "don't go through all of the shenanigans the US has, which is extreme polarization followed by government shutdown threats, followed by continuing resolutions," G. Scott Hubbard, a former top NASA official, told AFP.

For better or worse, America is locked into its new public-private paradigm.

Artemis was intentionally designed with an array of international partnerships -- Europe, Canada, Japan, the United Arab Emirates and more -- in order to prevent it from being scrapped, said Dreier.

Moreover, a previous Moon-to-Mars program called Constellation that was conceived in the 2000s and managed more like Apollo was canceled, largely due to budget constraints, so there is little realistic alternative.

(F.Schuster--BBZ)