Berliner Boersenzeitung - China, Trump, and the power of war?

EUR -
AED 3.827098
AFN 73.346624
ALL 99.102313
AMD 415.781104
ANG 1.875245
AOA 950.256675
ARS 1075.878887
AUD 1.658459
AWG 1.878112
AZN 1.788232
BAM 1.976147
BBD 2.100852
BDT 126.411601
BGN 1.954812
BHD 0.392702
BIF 3077.315216
BMD 1.041948
BND 1.42539
BOB 7.190032
BRL 6.401941
BSD 1.040524
BTN 89.282298
BWP 14.461178
BYN 3.405093
BYR 20422.18978
BZD 2.09004
CAD 1.491038
CDF 2988.854884
CHF 0.939452
CLF 0.038161
CLP 1052.972312
CNY 7.629665
CNH 7.636597
COP 4552.272814
CRC 530.371165
CUC 1.041948
CUP 27.611634
CVE 111.412159
CZK 25.148428
DJF 185.279515
DKK 7.458684
DOP 63.555623
DZD 141.031875
EGP 52.773442
ERN 15.629227
ETB 132.864292
FJD 2.40862
FKP 0.825204
GBP 0.830475
GEL 2.933082
GGP 0.825204
GHS 15.295491
GIP 0.825204
GMD 75.542839
GNF 8994.70057
GTQ 8.027657
GYD 217.580323
HKD 8.099659
HNL 26.443787
HRK 7.473798
HTG 135.910714
HUF 413.924226
IDR 16831.531198
ILS 3.792609
IMP 0.825204
INR 89.272321
IQD 1363.100624
IRR 43866.030243
ISK 144.288437
JEP 0.825204
JMD 162.011264
JOD 0.739051
JPY 163.543159
KES 134.671322
KGS 90.649592
KHR 4197.257489
KMF 485.67821
KPW 937.75303
KRW 1517.436429
KWD 0.321236
KYD 0.867061
KZT 546.073629
LAK 22701.399363
LBP 93178.10584
LKR 305.645894
LRD 191.966591
LSL 19.527554
LTL 3.076603
LVL 0.630264
LYD 5.113702
MAD 10.494558
MDL 19.368616
MGA 4925.813357
MKD 61.520148
MMK 3384.207948
MNT 3540.540725
MOP 8.337043
MRU 41.629438
MUR 48.71127
MVR 16.042866
MWK 1804.21176
MXN 21.246361
MYR 4.700211
MZN 66.584392
NAD 19.528122
NGN 1609.508403
NIO 38.284566
NOK 11.725353
NPR 142.85465
NZD 1.836757
OMR 0.401148
PAB 1.040514
PEN 3.905412
PGK 4.167996
PHP 60.423675
PKR 289.774637
PLN 4.255328
PYG 8144.942855
QAR 3.793055
RON 4.972594
RSD 117.019174
RUB 112.526676
RWF 1453.594891
SAR 3.912269
SBD 8.735232
SCR 14.753323
SDG 626.734582
SEK 11.467101
SGD 1.416289
SHP 0.825204
SLE 23.75055
SLL 21849.141349
SOS 594.634084
SRD 36.503103
STD 21566.229398
SVC 9.10409
SYP 2617.927013
SZL 19.522388
THB 35.85084
TJS 11.367041
TMT 3.657239
TND 3.340698
TOP 2.440348
TRY 36.81047
TTD 7.057943
TWD 34.126417
TZS 2577.000026
UAH 43.848934
UGX 3823.367434
USD 1.041948
UYU 45.872326
UZS 13428.394807
VES 55.349432
VND 26444.651868
VUV 123.702208
WST 2.878682
XAF 662.794206
XAG 0.034451
XAU 0.000394
XCD 2.815917
XDR 0.79783
XOF 662.787778
XPF 119.331742
YER 260.877806
ZAR 19.276723
ZMK 9378.790985
ZMW 28.977647
ZWL 335.506978
  • RIO

    0.3450

    58.945

    +0.59%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1500

    7.11

    -2.11%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    62

    0%

  • NGG

    -0.4200

    58.73

    -0.72%

  • RELX

    0.1370

    45.567

    +0.3%

  • VOD

    -0.0090

    8.461

    -0.11%

  • BTI

    -0.0350

    36.955

    -0.09%

  • BCC

    2.2000

    120.94

    +1.82%

  • CMSD

    -0.0500

    23.65

    -0.21%

  • SCS

    0.1050

    11.715

    +0.9%

  • BCE

    0.0300

    23.85

    +0.13%

  • GSK

    0.2800

    33.75

    +0.83%

  • JRI

    0.0800

    12.5

    +0.64%

  • BP

    0.6650

    31.135

    +2.14%

  • CMSC

    -0.0100

    23.42

    -0.04%

  • AZN

    0.7300

    66.98

    +1.09%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.