Berliner Boersenzeitung - China, Trump, and the power of war?

EUR -
AED 3.799134
AFN 73.438201
ALL 97.433277
AMD 413.677548
ANG 1.864995
AOA 945.904829
ARS 1070.787069
AUD 1.659857
AWG 1.864403
AZN 1.760706
BAM 1.943498
BBD 2.089375
BDT 125.981359
BGN 1.953864
BHD 0.389847
BIF 2999.594485
BMD 1.034343
BND 1.40867
BOB 7.150669
BRL 6.312081
BSD 1.03475
BTN 88.691751
BWP 14.34208
BYN 3.386432
BYR 20273.121346
BZD 2.078623
CAD 1.484985
CDF 2968.051644
CHF 0.940704
CLF 0.037667
CLP 1039.348891
CNY 7.578062
CNH 7.593685
COP 4486.286602
CRC 525.766973
CUC 1.034343
CUP 27.410088
CVE 110.357602
CZK 25.125737
DJF 183.823516
DKK 7.460737
DOP 63.493141
DZD 140.065581
EGP 52.394123
ERN 15.515144
ETB 130.378803
FJD 2.402159
FKP 0.819181
GBP 0.828892
GEL 2.911692
GGP 0.819181
GHS 15.215488
GIP 0.819181
GMD 72.916023
GNF 8914.284911
GTQ 7.988359
GYD 216.497544
HKD 8.044551
HNL 26.307482
HRK 7.419245
HTG 135.063782
HUF 415.48507
IDR 16740.840254
ILS 3.771354
IMP 0.819181
INR 88.753653
IQD 1354.989233
IRR 43532.90887
ISK 145.30439
JEP 0.819181
JMD 161.853949
JOD 0.733762
JPY 163.397194
KES 133.946967
KGS 89.987599
KHR 4178.745149
KMF 491.31265
KPW 930.908055
KRW 1504.616996
KWD 0.318878
KYD 0.862333
KZT 547.032165
LAK 22546.092152
LBP 92677.126333
LKR 305.784478
LRD 193.422115
LSL 19.345756
LTL 3.054146
LVL 0.625664
LYD 5.092715
MAD 10.381958
MDL 19.092963
MGA 4856.239658
MKD 61.482865
MMK 3359.505476
MNT 3514.697127
MOP 8.28786
MRU 41.218297
MUR 48.045281
MVR 15.980302
MWK 1793.550335
MXN 21.021706
MYR 4.641612
MZN 66.095096
NAD 19.340492
NGN 1593.92255
NIO 38.078606
NOK 11.732861
NPR 141.907767
NZD 1.835912
OMR 0.398185
PAB 1.03484
PEN 3.900521
PGK 4.204593
PHP 60.26237
PKR 288.012882
PLN 4.262372
PYG 8184.19654
QAR 3.766058
RON 4.971774
RSD 117.054528
RUB 110.935423
RWF 1433.599295
SAR 3.882409
SBD 8.675604
SCR 14.707638
SDG 621.640186
SEK 11.502716
SGD 1.41104
SHP 0.819181
SLE 23.562738
SLL 21689.657115
SOS 591.124918
SRD 36.279062
STD 21408.810234
SVC 9.054687
SYP 2598.817883
SZL 19.341963
THB 35.746472
TJS 11.3103
TMT 3.630544
TND 3.289058
TOP 2.422533
TRY 36.551559
TTD 7.019501
TWD 33.917447
TZS 2563.773055
UAH 43.76784
UGX 3821.809118
USD 1.034343
UYU 45.511923
UZS 13399.187245
VES 54.824057
VND 26241.280028
VUV 122.799264
WST 2.85767
XAF 651.824846
XAG 0.034443
XAU 0.00039
XCD 2.795363
XDR 0.796948
XOF 651.635981
XPF 119.331742
YER 257.809942
ZAR 19.351628
ZMK 9310.330343
ZMW 29.05183
ZWL 333.058
  • NGG

    -0.2700

    58.6

    -0.46%

  • CMSC

    -0.2600

    23.23

    -1.12%

  • SCS

    -0.2400

    11.2

    -2.14%

  • GSK

    0.1300

    34.09

    +0.38%

  • RYCEF

    0.1100

    7.2

    +1.53%

  • RBGPF

    -2.6900

    59.31

    -4.54%

  • RIO

    -0.1900

    58.19

    -0.33%

  • CMSD

    -0.2700

    23.46

    -1.15%

  • BTI

    -0.1900

    36.78

    -0.52%

  • BCE

    -0.0800

    23.86

    -0.34%

  • BP

    0.8100

    31.83

    +2.54%

  • VOD

    -0.0600

    8.41

    -0.71%

  • BCC

    -2.0000

    118.22

    -1.69%

  • RELX

    0.3300

    45.98

    +0.72%

  • AZN

    -0.2000

    66.64

    -0.3%

  • JRI

    -0.2300

    12.22

    -1.88%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.