Berliner Boersenzeitung - China, Trump, and the power of war?

EUR -
AED 3.787446
AFN 73.212268
ALL 97.702081
AMD 408.822755
ANG 1.86044
AOA 942.989792
ARS 1068.040955
AUD 1.659676
AWG 1.856082
AZN 1.750761
BAM 1.960604
BBD 2.084297
BDT 125.428523
BGN 1.957403
BHD 0.388634
BIF 2991.384688
BMD 1.031156
BND 1.413274
BOB 7.133339
BRL 6.306347
BSD 1.03243
BTN 88.63444
BWP 14.467534
BYN 3.378064
BYR 20210.665251
BZD 2.07347
CAD 1.483174
CDF 2958.902564
CHF 0.939275
CLF 0.037518
CLP 1035.240274
CNY 7.554715
CNH 7.582072
COP 4466.185804
CRC 523.382316
CUC 1.031156
CUP 27.325644
CVE 110.027178
CZK 25.121015
DJF 183.257436
DKK 7.46151
DOP 63.297563
DZD 140.293974
EGP 52.173934
ERN 15.467346
ETB 129.977698
FJD 2.400893
FKP 0.816657
GBP 0.834396
GEL 2.902672
GGP 0.816657
GHS 15.168737
GIP 0.816657
GMD 73.211891
GNF 8917.440606
GTQ 7.966441
GYD 215.894767
HKD 8.021886
HNL 26.243035
HRK 7.396388
HTG 134.676046
HUF 414.081576
IDR 16749.846615
ILS 3.780456
IMP 0.816657
INR 88.577676
IQD 1350.814871
IRR 43398.771788
ISK 145.104469
JEP 0.816657
JMD 161.666091
JOD 0.731401
JPY 163.230506
KES 133.534442
KGS 89.71094
KHR 4165.871705
KMF 489.799434
KPW 928.040175
KRW 1505.787156
KWD 0.317844
KYD 0.860253
KZT 543.721602
LAK 22476.63391
LBP 92391.612143
LKR 305.539328
LRD 192.826319
LSL 19.279136
LTL 3.044736
LVL 0.623737
LYD 5.083765
MAD 10.349974
MDL 19.044459
MGA 4841.27884
MKD 61.561501
MMK 3349.155733
MNT 3503.86928
MOP 8.271325
MRU 41.091972
MUR 48.048646
MVR 15.889343
MWK 1788.025467
MXN 21.012489
MYR 4.642778
MZN 65.8907
NAD 19.270066
NGN 1590.20811
NIO 37.874061
NOK 11.759349
NPR 141.8085
NZD 1.838186
OMR 0.396965
PAB 1.032374
PEN 3.899313
PGK 4.191666
PHP 60.405151
PKR 287.125161
PLN 4.275383
PYG 8170.096422
QAR 3.754412
RON 4.972446
RSD 117.075444
RUB 107.760608
RWF 1429.182757
SAR 3.870601
SBD 8.702361
SCR 15.365226
SDG 619.724831
SEK 11.504669
SGD 1.410612
SHP 0.816657
SLE 23.489458
SLL 21622.83705
SOS 589.310063
SRD 36.194107
STD 21342.855383
SVC 9.033219
SYP 2590.811616
SZL 19.287973
THB 35.713581
TJS 11.292656
TMT 3.619359
TND 3.279256
TOP 2.415073
TRY 36.447358
TTD 7.001153
TWD 33.88019
TZS 2567.579529
UAH 43.661273
UGX 3823.330293
USD 1.031156
UYU 45.401677
UZS 13343.163638
VES 54.658728
VND 26173.327078
VUV 122.420952
WST 2.848866
XAF 657.526529
XAG 0.0343
XAU 0.000388
XCD 2.786751
XDR 0.794897
XOF 649.629149
XPF 119.331742
YER 257.015974
ZAR 19.485468
ZMK 9281.666528
ZMW 28.877491
ZWL 332.031937
  • RBGPF

    -2.6900

    59.31

    -4.54%

  • CMSC

    -0.0800

    23.15

    -0.35%

  • CMSD

    -0.0200

    23.44

    -0.09%

  • BCC

    -0.0800

    118.14

    -0.07%

  • JRI

    -0.0500

    12.17

    -0.41%

  • SCS

    -0.0100

    11.19

    -0.09%

  • BCE

    -0.4000

    23.46

    -1.71%

  • RIO

    0.1960

    58.386

    +0.34%

  • NGG

    -0.9100

    57.69

    -1.58%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0300

    7.17

    -0.42%

  • GSK

    -0.2750

    33.815

    -0.81%

  • RELX

    0.6900

    46.67

    +1.48%

  • VOD

    -0.2200

    8.19

    -2.69%

  • BTI

    -0.2600

    36.52

    -0.71%

  • BP

    -0.8400

    30.99

    -2.71%

  • AZN

    -0.1550

    66.485

    -0.23%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.