Berliner Boersenzeitung - China, Trump, and the power of war?

EUR -
AED 3.784692
AFN 73.198448
ALL 97.52768
AMD 411.285686
ANG 1.854032
AOA 941.270843
ARS 1067.244138
AUD 1.66332
AWG 1.854724
AZN 1.72798
BAM 1.953832
BBD 2.077108
BDT 124.994086
BGN 1.953502
BHD 0.388397
BIF 3042.834761
BMD 1.030402
BND 1.408481
BOB 7.108839
BRL 6.292252
BSD 1.028864
BTN 88.33002
BWP 14.418475
BYN 3.366609
BYR 20195.879422
BZD 2.066418
CAD 1.481383
CDF 2957.253758
CHF 0.938904
CLF 0.037393
CLP 1031.783021
CNY 7.554497
CNH 7.574521
COP 4457.519101
CRC 521.574585
CUC 1.030402
CUP 27.305653
CVE 110.154035
CZK 25.121922
DJF 183.195456
DKK 7.461486
DOP 62.95658
DZD 140.004901
EGP 52.138962
ERN 15.45603
ETB 129.624747
FJD 2.40027
FKP 0.81606
GBP 0.835966
GEL 2.859392
GGP 0.81606
GHS 15.142746
GIP 0.81606
GMD 73.158381
GNF 8892.093166
GTQ 7.939003
GYD 215.153263
HKD 8.016476
HNL 26.223978
HRK 7.390977
HTG 134.214797
HUF 414.468889
IDR 16716.21183
ILS 3.774349
IMP 0.81606
INR 88.54126
IQD 1349.826635
IRR 43379.924605
ISK 145.039346
JEP 0.81606
JMD 161.107706
JOD 0.73097
JPY 162.914286
KES 133.1799
KGS 89.644981
KHR 4157.811575
KMF 492.023583
KPW 927.361234
KRW 1504.891776
KWD 0.317735
KYD 0.857336
KZT 541.854156
LAK 22475.647466
LBP 92324.020464
LKR 304.503255
LRD 192.942625
LSL 19.412744
LTL 3.042509
LVL 0.62328
LYD 5.074723
MAD 10.351931
MDL 18.97988
MGA 4842.889646
MKD 61.500649
MMK 3346.705539
MNT 3501.3059
MOP 8.242996
MRU 41.035755
MUR 48.2738
MVR 15.878359
MWK 1785.207737
MXN 21.062489
MYR 4.637838
MZN 65.853311
NAD 19.412744
NGN 1590.600421
NIO 37.826339
NOK 11.776341
NPR 141.327632
NZD 1.841334
OMR 0.396673
PAB 1.028864
PEN 3.889798
PGK 4.133461
PHP 60.226922
PKR 287.169787
PLN 4.276699
PYG 8141.798255
QAR 3.751177
RON 4.972824
RSD 117.065002
RUB 107.677565
RWF 1427.106786
SAR 3.86768
SBD 8.688662
SCR 15.214057
SDG 619.271538
SEK 11.514232
SGD 1.410981
SHP 0.81606
SLE 23.492236
SLL 21607.018098
SOS 588.872975
SRD 36.167628
STD 21327.241261
SVC 9.001932
SYP 2588.916216
SZL 19.400457
THB 35.744699
TJS 11.254363
TMT 3.606407
TND 3.314287
TOP 2.413305
TRY 36.442947
TTD 6.976972
TWD 33.944569
TZS 2565.700859
UAH 43.510469
UGX 3810.161785
USD 1.030402
UYU 45.244422
UZS 13384.922259
VES 54.833835
VND 26156.755058
VUV 122.33139
WST 2.846782
XAF 655.296878
XAG 0.034189
XAU 0.000387
XCD 2.784713
XDR 0.792202
XOF 653.27507
XPF 119.331742
YER 256.73226
ZAR 19.513235
ZMK 9274.855421
ZMW 28.779009
ZWL 331.789027
  • RYCEF

    7.2200

    7.22

    +100%

  • CMSC

    -0.1300

    23.1

    -0.56%

  • BTI

    -0.0400

    36.74

    -0.11%

  • AZN

    -0.0600

    66.58

    -0.09%

  • RELX

    0.7900

    46.77

    +1.69%

  • NGG

    -0.6200

    57.98

    -1.07%

  • GSK

    -0.3400

    33.75

    -1.01%

  • BP

    -0.7100

    31.12

    -2.28%

  • RIO

    0.4400

    58.63

    +0.75%

  • RBGPF

    59.3100

    59.31

    +100%

  • VOD

    -0.2000

    8.21

    -2.44%

  • BCC

    -0.8200

    117.4

    -0.7%

  • SCS

    0.1000

    11.3

    +0.88%

  • BCE

    -0.2300

    23.63

    -0.97%

  • CMSD

    -0.0600

    23.4

    -0.26%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    12.22

    0%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.